Climategate
Submitted by CARPE DIEM
Recently leaked emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom expose deceit, duplicity and collusion between climate researchers to maintain the fraud of the manmade global warming theory. These emails reveal stunning behind-the-scenes details about how this fraud has been developed and perpetuated. In this video historical climatologist and retired university professor Dr. Timothy F. Ball shares his insights on what they show.
Here are several more links on Climategate:
CLIMATE BOMBSHELL: Hacker leaks thousands of emails showing conspiracy to “hide” the real data on manmade climate change
The Death Blow to Climate Science
And of course, Wikipedia already has a webpage: Climatic Research Unit e-mail Hacking Incident
Visit 1800blogger to see all of our industry leading blogs.
Are you an investor? Have something you want to say about the economy? Register on Econoimist Blog now and get published within minutes. Before posting, it is recommended that you review our posting guidelines.
December 2nd, 2009 at 1:42 am
There are a number of reponses to the Climategate documents that imply that there is no issue - i.e. “move along people, there’s nothing to see here”.
However, what these apologists don’t answer is this question:
If the Climate Science is “unequivocal” in nature and there is a huge consensus supporting it, then why did the East Anglia CRU spend so much effort on:
a) data and email deletion
b) avoiding the UK Freedom of Information Act
c) intimidating science journal editors
d) persecuting dissenting scientists
e) subverting the peer review process
f) instructing programmers to build models with a forgone conclusion
The only explanation for these actions are that these influential scientists did not feel secure enough about the pure models and data.
Instead, they used “strong arm” tactics to manufacture a consensus.
Climate Science - definitely not your father’s science!
p.s. - BTW, what really happened to the original raw data CRU?